"We create our own reality… We're history's actors."
Foreclosed
The George W. Bush StoryBy Tom Engelhardt
They may have been the most disastrous dreamers, the most reckless gamblers, and the most vigorous imperial hucksters and grifters in our history. Selling was their passion. And they were classic American salesmen -- if you're talking about underwater land in Florida, or the Brooklyn Bridge, or three-card monte, or bizarre visions of Iraqi unmanned aerial vehicles armed with chemical and biological weaponry let loose over the U.S., or Saddam Hussein's mushroom clouds rising over American cities, or a full-scale reordering of the Middle East to our taste, or simply eternal global dominance.
When historians look back, it will be far clearer that the "commander-in-chief" of a "wartime" country and his top officials were focused, first and foremost, not on the shifting "central theaters" of the Global War on Terror, but on the theater that mattered most to them -- the "home front" where they spent inordinate amounts of time selling the American people a bill of goods. Of his timing in ramping up a campaign to invade Iraq in September 2002, White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card infamously explained: "From a marketing point of view, you don't introduce new products in August."
Indeed.
From a White House where "victory strategies" meant purely for domestic consumption poured out, to the Pentagon where bevies of generals, admirals, and other high officers were constantly being mustered, not to lead armies but to lead public opinion, their selling focus was total. They were always releasing "new product."
Bill Kristol was on hardtalk a few days ago. Sackur asked him about what a McCain defeat would mean for conservatism in the United States. Kristol replied: "the Republican party may lose this election, but conservatism has never been stronger in the United States. Look at Obama's foreign policy, it is hawkish by any standards. There is no going back ..."
ReplyDeleteSomehow that statement frightens me ... More so, because I believe it to be true.
I just read over my own comment ... I am really stupid! He said "neoconservatism" and not "conservatism". And thank you for the links! Especially the second.
ReplyDelete